Formatting only, from dart fix. No behaviour change — the release APK and the full suite both pass either way. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
144 lines
5.7 KiB
Dart
144 lines
5.7 KiB
Dart
import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';
|
|
import 'package:nearle_pos/data/datasources/local_store.dart';
|
|
import 'package:nearle_pos/data/local/staff_dao.dart';
|
|
import 'package:nearle_pos/domain/entities/store_account.dart';
|
|
|
|
/// The till shipped with three names and three PINs compiled into it —
|
|
/// Suriya/4821, Divya/5093, Rahul/6274 — identical on every install and
|
|
/// readable by anyone with the APK. They existed because a shop with nothing in
|
|
/// its back office still has to trade on day one, and that is still true: only
|
|
/// 116 of 596 accounts on the platform have a PIN, and the outlet this build
|
|
/// ships pointed at has none at all.
|
|
///
|
|
/// So they stay, as a last resort, and these cover the thing that makes that
|
|
/// safe: real staff must *retire* them rather than sit alongside them.
|
|
StaffDao get staff => LocalStore.instance.staff;
|
|
|
|
void main() {
|
|
TestWidgetsFlutterBinding.ensureInitialized();
|
|
|
|
setUp(() async {
|
|
await LocalStore.instance.reset();
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a fresh till has the seeded accounts and they work', () async {
|
|
final seeded = await staff.all();
|
|
|
|
expect(seeded, hasLength(3));
|
|
expect(await staff.authenticate('4821'), isNotNull);
|
|
// Every one is flagged, so the first person in is made to change it.
|
|
expect(seeded.every((s) => s.mustChangePin), isTrue);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('real staff retire the built-in PINs', () async {
|
|
// The whole point. Without this the hardcoded logins would survive next to
|
|
// the real ones for ever, on every terminal in the fleet.
|
|
await staff.replaceFromBackOffice(const [
|
|
StaffImportRecord(
|
|
localId: 'boffice-1229',
|
|
name: 'Selvapuram',
|
|
role: StaffRole.manager,
|
|
pin: '7391',
|
|
),
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
expect(await staff.authenticate('7391'), isNotNull,
|
|
reason: 'the imported account must work',);
|
|
expect(await staff.authenticate('4821'), isNull,
|
|
reason: 'Suriya was compiled into the app and must be gone',);
|
|
expect(await staff.authenticate('5093'), isNull);
|
|
expect(await staff.authenticate('6274'), isNull);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('an empty answer leaves a working till alone', () async {
|
|
// The common case: most outlets have nobody recorded. Wiping the logins
|
|
// because the back office has not been filled in yet would close a shop.
|
|
final written = await staff.replaceFromBackOffice(const []);
|
|
|
|
expect(written, 0);
|
|
expect(await staff.authenticate('4821'), isNotNull);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a leaver loses the till on the next sign-in', () async {
|
|
await staff.replaceFromBackOffice(const [
|
|
StaffImportRecord(
|
|
localId: 'boffice-1', name: 'Asha', role: StaffRole.cashier, pin: '7391',),
|
|
StaffImportRecord(
|
|
localId: 'boffice-2', name: 'Ravi', role: StaffRole.cashier, pin: '8402',),
|
|
]);
|
|
expect(await staff.authenticate('8402'), isNotNull);
|
|
|
|
// Ravi is removed in the back office.
|
|
await staff.replaceFromBackOffice(const [
|
|
StaffImportRecord(
|
|
localId: 'boffice-1', name: 'Asha', role: StaffRole.cashier, pin: '7391',),
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
expect(await staff.authenticate('7391'), isNotNull);
|
|
expect(await staff.authenticate('8402'), isNull);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('re-syncing the same person updates rather than duplicates', () async {
|
|
// Keyed on the back office user id, so a shop that changes somebody's PIN
|
|
// gets one account with a new PIN, not two accounts with one each.
|
|
await staff.replaceFromBackOffice(const [
|
|
StaffImportRecord(
|
|
localId: 'boffice-1', name: 'Asha', role: StaffRole.cashier, pin: '7391',),
|
|
]);
|
|
await staff.replaceFromBackOffice(const [
|
|
StaffImportRecord(
|
|
localId: 'boffice-1', name: 'Asha Kumar', role: StaffRole.manager, pin: '8402',),
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
final all = await staff.all();
|
|
expect(all, hasLength(1));
|
|
expect(all.single.name, 'Asha Kumar');
|
|
expect(all.single.role, StaffRole.manager);
|
|
expect(await staff.authenticate('8402'), isNotNull);
|
|
expect(await staff.authenticate('7391'), isNull);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('an imported PIN is not flagged for change', () async {
|
|
// It was set by the shop in the back office, so it is already theirs. The
|
|
// flag is for the seeds, which everyone shares.
|
|
await staff.replaceFromBackOffice(const [
|
|
StaffImportRecord(
|
|
localId: 'boffice-1', name: 'Asha', role: StaffRole.cashier, pin: '7391',),
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
final imported = await staff.authenticate('7391');
|
|
expect(imported!.mustChangePin, isFalse);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('an unusable PIN is skipped rather than written', () async {
|
|
// A name on screen that nobody can sign in as reads as a broken terminal.
|
|
// `pin = 0` is the single most common value in app_users.
|
|
await staff.replaceFromBackOffice(const [
|
|
StaffImportRecord(
|
|
localId: 'boffice-1', name: 'No PIN', role: StaffRole.cashier, pin: '0',),
|
|
StaffImportRecord(
|
|
localId: 'boffice-2', name: 'Blank', role: StaffRole.cashier, pin: '',),
|
|
StaffImportRecord(
|
|
localId: 'boffice-3', name: 'Usable', role: StaffRole.cashier, pin: '7391',),
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
final all = await staff.all();
|
|
expect(all, hasLength(1));
|
|
expect(all.single.name, 'Usable');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('an answer of nothing usable does not strand the till', () async {
|
|
// Every row unusable is not the same as a deliberate empty list, but it has
|
|
// to behave the same way — otherwise a back office full of `pin = 0` rows
|
|
// would deactivate the seeds and leave nobody able to sign in.
|
|
final written = await staff.replaceFromBackOffice(const [
|
|
StaffImportRecord(
|
|
localId: 'boffice-1', name: 'No PIN', role: StaffRole.cashier, pin: '0',),
|
|
]);
|
|
|
|
expect(written, 0);
|
|
expect(await staff.authenticate('4821'), isNotNull,
|
|
reason: 'the seeds must survive an import that wrote nobody',);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|