Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Suriya
fe428931ec Upload shopper registrations, and charge GST to the lines that earned it
Two defects that share a shape: a figure landing on the wrong record.

Bill-level discounts were apportioned across every line by a single
factor, so "20% off Beverages" pulled tax out of the atta line as well.
The bill total was right either way, which is what made it easy to ship
— only the slab split on a filed return was wrong. Targeted campaigns
now reduce the lines they name, and bill-wide reductions still spread
pro rata, so the arithmetic is unchanged wherever it was already right.

Shoppers registered at a till only ever reached the back office as three
fields riding along on a bill. Somebody who signed up and bought nothing
existed on one terminal and nowhere else, and two tills registering the
same mobile each minted their own row. Customers are now an outbox of
their own on pos/{store}/{terminal}/customer, and the id is a UUIDv5
over the normalised mobile number — so a hundred terminals agree on who
a shopper is without talking to each other.

Registrations go up before bills, and a failure there cannot strand a
day's takings. No loyalty figures are sent: they belong to the bill
stream, which is idempotent and knows about every counter.

Two things found while building it. Numbers were keyed on raw digits, so
a cashier typing +91 forked a shopper as effectively as a random id
would. And the sale path wrote the customer with ConflictAlgorithm
.replace, which is a DELETE and an INSERT — every column absent from the
row reverts to its schema default, so the new sync flag would have been
cleared by the shopper's next purchase.

Schema v8. Existing customers are queued rather than assumed sent: the
terminal cannot tell an imported row from a locally registered one, and
only one of those mistakes loses somebody.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-03 11:34:27 +05:30
Suriya
46d354ced1 Build promos for real: engine, storage, editor, and application at the till
The Promo module was a mockup. Three hardcoded rows, a toggle that changed
nothing, and no promo code anywhere in lib/domain or lib/data. A cashier
looking at it would reasonably conclude promotions were running.

Engine (domain/services/promo_engine.dart)
- Five campaign types: percent or flat off the bill, percent off a category
  or a product, and buy-X-get-Y.
- Conditions: date range (inclusive of the closing day), days of the week,
  minimum bill value, and a cap on what a percentage can take off — without
  one an unusually large trolley gives away more than the campaign was costed
  for.
- Stacking is conservative by default. All stackable campaigns apply together;
  of the exclusive ones only the single best does, chosen by what it is worth
  to the shopper with priority breaking ties. Two percentages compounding
  produce a discount nobody signed off, and the shop finds out at the end of
  the month.
- The total is capped at the subtotal, so no combination of campaign, tier and
  manual discount can turn a sale into a payout.
- buy-X-get-Y counts whole groups only, and prices the free unit at what is
  actually being charged — a line already carrying a manual discount must not
  refund more than it took.

Kept out of Cart deliberately: Cart owns arithmetic that must never be wrong,
this owns policy a shop changes weekly.

Storage (schema v6, plus promos_json on orders at v7)
- Campaigns persist locally, because a shop mid-promotion with a dead line
  still has to honour the price on the shelf edge.
- A bill records the campaign name and the amount given, not a link to the
  row. A campaign edited or deleted later cannot change what a past sale
  shows, and a reprinted receipt still names what the shopper was given.
- On read-back the promo amounts are subtracted from the manual discount,
  because bill_discount already contains them. Restoring both at full value
  would discount the bill twice — the same shape as the bug that used to
  overstate synced totals.

At the till
- Every cart mutation re-evaluates, so a promo cannot survive the line that
  earned it being removed.
- A resumed parked bill is re-evaluated rather than restored: a campaign that
  has since ended must not be honoured because the bill was parked while it
  was running.
- Campaigns are named individually on the billing panel and the printed
  receipt, so a shopper who came in for an advertised offer can see it applied.

Editor
- Full CRUD, admin-only, with validation for the cases that would save happily
  and then silently never fire — a targeted campaign with no target, a
  percentage over 100, an end date before the start.

Tests: 199 -> 210. Covers each campaign type, the eligibility conditions, the
stacking rules, the impossible-to-go-negative guarantee, GST recomputation
against the reduced total, round-tripping, and the double-count guard.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-01 13:36:50 +05:30