Files
catalogue_backend/Dockerfile
Suriyakumarvijayanayagam ea0c00d68e Ship config as .env.production - Dokploy was overwriting the committed .env
The container was never getting its configuration, so it started with nothing
set and Traefik reported a Bad Gateway on every route.

Dokploy writes its own .env into the build context from the service's
Environment tab AFTER cloning the repository. That tab is empty, so it wrote a
zero-byte file over the committed one, and `COPY .env .` faithfully copied the
empty result into the image. The checkout showed it exactly: every file
timestamped 08:33, and .env alone at 08:34 with a size of 0. Inside the running
container, /app/.env was 0 bytes.

Nothing about this is visible from the outside. The build log shows the COPY
succeeding, the image is produced, and the platform reports only a 502.

Dokploy does not manage .env.production, so the config now travels under that
name and the Dockerfile copies it to /app/.env in the image. Anything set in the
Environment tab still wins at runtime, because settings.py calls load_dotenv()
without override=True.

Verified by reconstructing the build context the way Dokploy does - git archive
of HEAD, then an empty .env written over it - applying .dockerignore and the
COPY lines, and booting the result with an empty environment: /app/.env is 4938
bytes, the sign-in passwords are absent, and scripts/check_deploy.sh reports 6
passed, 0 failed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-13 14:13:05 +05:30

117 lines
5.7 KiB
Docker

# Multi-stage, mirroring catalogue_frontend/Dockerfile: a build stage that
# resolves dependencies, then a clean runtime stage that copies in only the
# result. There it is `npm ci` -> dist/; here it is pip -> a virtualenv.
# ---- Build stage ----
FROM python:3.11-slim AS build
WORKDIR /app
# Dependencies land in a self-contained venv so the runtime stage can take that
# one directory and leave pip, its HTTP cache and the downloaded wheels behind.
#
# requirements.txt is copied on its own, ahead of the source, for the same
# reason the frontend stage copies package.json before the rest of the app:
# this layer is cached on the file's checksum, so editing a router does not
# reinstall torch.
#
# psycopg[binary] avoids needing libpq-dev; sentence-transformers/scikit-learn/
# scipy all ship prebuilt wheels for this image, so no compiler is needed and
# this stage installs no build toolchain. Playwright's Python package installs,
# but its browser binary is NOT installed here - it's only a last-resort
# image-search fallback (see requirements.txt); run `playwright install
# chromium` in the container if you need that specific fallback tier.
COPY requirements.txt .
RUN python -m venv /opt/venv \
&& /opt/venv/bin/pip install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt
# ---- Runtime stage ----
FROM python:3.11-slim AS runtime
WORKDIR /app
# PATH: putting the venv first is what makes a bare `python`/`uvicorn` resolve
# to it - there is no "activate" step in a container.
# PYTHONUNBUFFERED: without it Dokploy's log view stays empty until a buffer
# happens to fill, so startup errors surface minutes after the container died.
# PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE: no .pyc to write into a read-only-ish image layer.
ENV PATH="/opt/venv/bin:$PATH"
ENV PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1
ENV PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1
COPY --from=build /opt/venv /opt/venv
COPY app ./app
COPY cli ./cli
COPY scripts ./scripts
COPY data ./data
COPY serve.py .
# The deployment's configuration, landing at /app/.env because settings.py
# resolves it from the backend root - app/infrastructure/settings.py takes
# parents[2], which is /app here - so it must sit next to app/, not inside it.
#
# The source file is named .env.production, NOT .env, and that detail is the
# whole point. Dokploy writes its own .env into the build context from the
# service's Environment tab AFTER cloning the repository. With that tab empty it
# writes an empty file, overwriting the committed one - so `COPY .env .` copied
# a zero-byte file, the container started with no configuration at all, and the
# platform reported only a Bad Gateway. The checkout showed it plainly: every
# file timestamped 08:33, and .env alone at 08:34, 0 bytes.
#
# Dokploy does not manage .env.production, so it survives. Anything set in the
# Environment tab still wins at runtime, because settings.py calls load_dotenv()
# without override=True and the process environment takes precedence.
COPY .env.production .env
# Pristine copies of everything the app also WRITES to, kept at a path that is
# never mounted over.
#
# /app/data/seed_catalogs and /app/app/intelligence/artifacts both need volumes
# (products added through the UI are appended to the first, retrained models
# are written to the second - otherwise a redeploy throws both away). But
# mounting a volume there hides the copies shipped in this image: a *named*
# volume is seeded from the image on first use, a *bind* mount is not, and
# Dokploy offers both. A bind mount would leave the API with zero seed catalogs
# and zero trained models, with nothing in the logs saying why.
#
# So keep a second copy here. On startup restore_bundled_assets()
# (app/infrastructure/persistence.py) copies in whatever the mounted directory
# is missing, and never overwrites what is already there.
RUN mkdir -p /app/.bundled \
&& cp -a /app/data/seed_catalogs /app/.bundled/seed_catalogs \
&& cp -a /app/app/intelligence/artifacts /app/.bundled/artifacts
# Declared so `docker run` without an explicit -v still gets an anonymous
# volume rather than writing into the container layer. Dokploy (and the compose
# file) name them properly; this is the floor, not the recommended setup.
VOLUME ["/app/data", "/app/app/intelligence/artifacts"]
# Answers on BOTH ports, the same way the frontend image does (nginx.conf has
# `listen 80; listen 3000;`). 3000 is what Dokploy routes a domain to; 8000 is
# what this project's README, the vite dev proxy and docker-compose all use.
# Serving both means the container works whichever one the platform is pointed
# at, instead of returning 502 from a perfectly healthy process.
#
# serve.py binds both sockets and hands them to one uvicorn - see the note
# there. To pin a single port, set PORT (PORT=8080 serves only 8080); to change
# the pair, set PORTS.
ENV PORTS=3000,8000
EXPOSE 3000 8000
# Liveness only, and passes if EITHER port answers.
#
# It probes "/", which is served from memory, NOT /api/health, which dials
# Postgres and Ollama. That is the whole point: the platform's response to a
# failed healthcheck is to stop routing traffic, so this may only ask "is the
# process still serving HTTP". Tying it to the database meant an unreachable
# Postgres blocked the handler for the OS TCP timeout, the check timed out, the
# container was marked unhealthy, and a perfectly healthy API returned Bad
# Gateway on every route. Use /api/health to ask whether dependencies are up;
# it reports them in the body and always answers 200.
HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=10s --start-period=40s --retries=3 \
CMD ["python", "serve.py", "--healthcheck"]
# Exec form: python is PID 1, so Docker's SIGTERM reaches it directly and a
# redeploy shuts down cleanly instead of waiting out the 10s kill timeout.
CMD ["python", "serve.py"]