A till signs in with a mobile number and a PIN, but createposuser still
accepted an account without a number. Such an account cannot reach the
sign-in screen at all, and the failure surfaces at a counter in front of
a queue rather than at the point of creation. Enforced in CreatePosUser,
so both doors are covered: POST /pos/users from the terminal and
createposuser from the console share that path.
Two checks, not one. normalisePosPhone answers ("", nil) rather than an
error for a value holding no digits, so "abc" would have passed an
emptiness check, then been written as a blank and skipped the uniqueness
check below it — which is the hole this closes.
Scope is new accounts only. The column stays nullable and UpdatePosUser
still reads an empty contactno as "leave alone", so the accounts that
predate the number keep working through the backfill and cannot have
theirs cleared. The PIN stays optional at creation.
Also in this change:
- docs: correct both phone-login handovers, which claimed creation
already required a number. The sequencing note in the PIN handover
said step 2 was a backfill that could never be finished; it now is
one, and POS_LOGIN.md says which half of the pair creation enforces.
- docs: remove credentials from the examples. POS_PHONE_LOGIN_HANDOVER
carried a real-looking back-office pair and a generated till password,
and POS_LOGIN.md a second one.
- posController.Staff: the comment justified scoping by token because
"the answer carries PINs". It has not since the PIN left the wire. The
scoping is still right for a different reason, which the comment now
gives.
- scratch/posstaffsetup: takes both mobile numbers as arguments and
refuses to run without them. Generating stand-ins would have produced
exactly what this change prevents. Validated before the database is
opened, in plan mode too, so a dry run cannot print a plan that apply
would reject halfway through and leave half a shop set up.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A PIN cannot open a closed terminal. The PIN route needs a session that already
exists, so a PIN-only account works only while somebody else is standing there
to unlock the till first. For a supervisor that was an outright deadlock and was
fixed last commit. For a cashier it is subtler and just as wrong: the shop
cannot open until two people have arrived, and whoever gets in at seven is as
often the cashier as the supervisor.
So every till account now gets a username and a password, and the role decides
the shell rather than the credential deciding it. A cashier signs in exactly the
way a supervisor does and is still held to billing only, because that comes from
roleid 8 and not from how they got in.
The earlier reasoning — that a second password is one more credential to leak
for no capability gained — was measuring the wrong thing. It counted the cost of
the credential and not the cost of the shop that cannot open without one.
CreatePosUser generates both when the request omits them, so provisioning is one
call per person and nobody has to invent a naming scheme. An explicit value
always wins. A generated name that collides walks to the next free one, because
a second cashier at one counter is ordinary rather than an error; a name the
caller supplied is refused instead, because silently signing somebody in as
another person's address is worse than a message. Uniqueness is checked against
authname and email together, since the insert writes the same value to both and
app_users_email_unique would otherwise fail the transaction rather than return
something anyone can act on.
The password comes back exactly once, in the creation response. Listing till
users still reports only has_password, so an admin who loses it reissues rather
than looks it up — the right shape even while the column behind it is plaintext.
The domain is deliberately unroutable. These are till credentials, never a
mailbox, and an address that looks deliverable invites somebody to try sending a
reset to it.
Verified against live rows by scratch/posseparation, which now checks the
cashier path too: cashier.1185@pos.nearle.in opens a closed terminal alone and
comes back can_manage_staff=false. All five outlets that stock products have
both accounts, each proved by an actual sign-in.
Also drops a stray `print(queryBuilder.String())` from GetAllUsers, which was
writing the whole SQL statement to stderr on every call.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
app_users is the only thing the two products have in common, and the code was
treating it as though it were the whole relationship. Both directions leaked.
Back-office roles were leaking into the till. PosRoleCanManageStaff returned
true for roleid 1 to 6, on the reasoning that somebody who already administers a
shop from a browser is not made less privileged by standing at the counter. That
sounds fine and is wrong: measured against live data it handed till-supervisor
powers to 68 accounts, 59 of them Nearle Daily Super admins, not one of whom is
the administrator of anybody's POS. Meanwhile the actual shop accounts carry
roleid 0 and were refused, so the mapping was backwards from intent in both
halves at once.
Till accounts were leaking into the application. GetStaffs is WHERE tenantid
with no role filter, so a Counter Cashier appeared in the tenant staff list
beside the delivery riders — a row every action on that page would fail against,
since a cashier has no app login, no rider shift and no back-office screen.
So: eligibility for a till is now granted explicitly by provisioning a
Supervisor or a Cashier, never inherited from a back-office role, and roles 7
and 8 are excluded from every Nearle Daily lookup. The exclusion lives in the
queries rather than in a check after them, because a check bolted on afterwards
has to be repeated at six call sites and is one edit away from being forgotten
at one of them — and that one would be the hole. A till account is not rejected
by the app login; it is not found.
Two things this surfaced that were not visible before.
A Supervisor could not open a till. PIN sign-in needs a session that already
exists, so once back-office roles were refused, an outlet whose only POS
accounts were PIN-only had no way in at all. Supervisors are now provisioned
with a username and password as well as a PIN; cashiers deliberately get neither,
because they sign on at a counter somebody has already opened and a second
password would be one more credential to leak for no capability gained.
UpdatePosUser silently dropped authname. It wrote the password, reported
success, and left the account unreachable by either lookup — the failure
surfaced at a counter as "not recognised" rather than on the screen that caused
it. Contactno had the same gap.
Verified against live rows rather than asserted, by scratch/posseparation: a
provisioned supervisor signs in and gets the supervisor shell; five real
back-office accounts including Super admins are refused; the supervisor is
invisible to applogin, tenant weblogin and the password-setup lookup; and no
till account appears in getallusers, while asking for role 7 by name still
returns them so the console can read its own people.
All five outlets that stock products now have a Supervisor and a Cashier.
Also moves the loose markdown into docs/, which was already staged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
An admin sets a shop up from a browser; a supervisor adds a cashier at the
counter. Both had to be possible, and only the second one was.
So the console gets createposuser / updateposuser / getposusers /
deleteposuser, under both /v1/web/tenants and /v1/mob/tenants — calling the
same service methods `/pos/users` calls. Not a parallel implementation: a
supervisor created from a browser is the same row, with the same PIN rules, the
same duplicate check and the same identity-column allocation, as one created at
a till. Two paths writing one table is precisely how the two stop matching, and
this codebase already had that happen once.
configid is inferred rather than asked for. It is a number nobody looks up, it
varies per tenant — 1087's accounts are spread across 1, 6 and 15 — and getting
it wrong creates somebody who cannot sign into the portal their colleagues use
and is invisible to half the platform's queries.
/posroles is served rather than left to the console to hardcode. A console that
knew supervisor was 7 would be wrong the day that changed and would have no way
to find out.
The outlet is the real difference between the two doors. A terminal proves it
with a signed token; the console asserts it, and is checked against the tenant
before anything is written. That is weaker, and it is worth being plain about:
these mint till credentials on an unauthenticated request, exactly like every
other route in the /v1/web and /v1/mob groups, because there is no auth
middleware on the web API at all. Documented as the weakest point in the design
and flagged to move behind a session guard once the console can hold one. The
terminal routes are untouched by it.
Proven in a rolled-back transaction against live data: the console creates a
supervisor at 1135, that supervisor signs in by PIN with can_manage_staff true,
the till's /pos/staff sees them alongside the two created at the counter, and
0451, 1234 and a duplicate PIN are each refused with the same message the
terminal gives.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two paths write `app_users`: the console's `tenants/createstaff`, and the
terminal's `/pos/users`. Only one of them checked anything.
`createstaff` wrote whatever it was handed. A cashier could be created there
with PIN "0451" — which a bigint column stores as 451 — and would then type four
digits at the counter and be refused for ever, with nothing on either screen to
explain it. Or with 1234, which live data already has on eleven accounts. Or
with a PIN somebody at the same outlet already had, which attributes a bill to
whichever row is read first. Or with no way to sign in at all.
None of that surfaced where it was caused. It surfaced at a counter, days later,
as "the new person cannot log in".
So the rules move into `ValidateStaffUser`, and both paths use it: a name, a
role that is actually a role, a PIN the schema can hold and nobody guesses
first, and at least one way to sign in. The duplicate-PIN check runs too, when
the row names an outlet.
The handler also stops answering 500 with a body claiming 409. Every one of
these is something the person filling in the form can fix, so it is a 400
carrying the reason.
`GetStaffs` now returns `rolename` alongside `roleid`, so a console can show
"Supervisor" without mapping ids itself — `app_roles` has six rows for four
back-office roles and most accounts carry an id absent from it, so any mapping
written client-side would be wrong.
This is what makes the two role systems one. A supervisor or cashier created
from the web behaves at the till exactly like one created at the till, because
there is now a single definition of what those are.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
`app_users.userid` is a `GENERATED BY DEFAULT AS IDENTITY` column. It did not
look like one: `information_schema.columns.column_default` is empty for identity
columns, and reading that as "no default at all" is how this came to compute its
own id with MAX+1.
That worked, and quietly did the wrong thing. An explicit id does not advance
the sequence, so two allocators ended up running in parallel — the sequence sat
at 1447 while MAX(userid) had reached 9189. They cannot collide today, because
almost nothing occupies the range between, but they converge on every insert and
the first collision would be a primary key violation on a live sign-up.
The insert now omits userid and reads it back with RETURNING. The advisory lock
stays, because it was never about the id: two supervisors adding staff at the
same instant could both find a PIN free and both take it, and a duplicate PIN
attributes a bill to whichever row is read first.
Also documents why the email columns go through NULLIF. `app_users_email_unique`
is real, and a second cashier created without an email would otherwise collide
on the empty string — while NULLs do not collide in Postgres. A cashier who
signs in by PIN alone has no email, which is the common case rather than the
edge one.
Verified in a rolled-back transaction against live data: creation allocates
1448, the sequence advances 1447 -> 1448, a second emailless user is accepted,
and a duplicate PIN is still refused.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A shop had no way to add the people who work in it. The terminal fell back to
three names and three PINs compiled into the app — the same three on every
install — because there was nothing for it to fall back *from*.
Two roles now exist in `app_roles`: Supervisor (7) runs the terminal and creates
staff, Cashier (8) bills. Fixed ids, written by hand, because that table has no
sequence and every id in it was assigned the same way. configid is left NULL
rather than duplicated per portal: a till is a till whichever portal a tenant
uses, and Admin already appears twice in that table for exactly that reason.
`/pos/users` is CRUD over them, and `/pos/login/pin` signs a cashier on at a
terminal a supervisor has already opened.
The rule every one of these follows: **tenant and outlet come from the caller's
token, never from the request.** There is no location field on the create body
to get wrong. A supervisor at Selvapuram cannot create staff at R mart, for the
same reason a till cannot bill into another shop's books — it is the same
inversion applied to people instead of sales.
PIN sign-in is deliberately behind the guard. Four digits is ten thousand
guesses, which is no barrier to an anonymous caller; requiring a session means a
real password opened the terminal first and the guesses are confined to one
outlet's own staff. The session it mints is fresh rather than derived, so a
cashier taking over from a supervisor drops their permissions instead of
inheriting them.
Three things the schema forced:
- A PIN cannot start with zero. `app_users.pin` is a bigint, so "0451" stores as
451 and reads back as three digits — a cashier would type four and be refused
for ever. Live data already holds one such account. Rendering refuses to show
a PIN it cannot represent, rather than showing a short one nobody can type.
- `app_users` has no sequence either, so the next id is read and written inside
one transaction behind an advisory lock. Two supervisors creating staff at the
same moment would otherwise compute the same id and one insert would lose.
- 1234, 1111 and friends are refused outright. Live data has 1234 on eleven
accounts and 1111 on nine.
Proven against outlet 1135, which had zero staff and was the reason the built-in
PINs were still load-bearing:
created 9188 Store Supervisor Supervisor can_manage_staff=true
created 9189 Counter Cashier Cashier can_manage_staff=false
/pos/staff now returns 2 an unknown PIN is refused
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The terminal shipped with three names and three PINs compiled into it. Same
three on every install, readable by anyone with the APK, and permanent —
nothing anywhere could replace them.
`/pos/staff` answers with the people the back office says may ring a bill at an
outlet, and the same list rides down with the session so a till is ready to
trade the moment it signs in. The terminal writes them over its own and
deactivates whatever it had, which is what actually kills the seeded logins.
Two sources are unioned because the schema has two and neither is complete.
`tenantstaffs` is the table built for this and holds 12 rows on the entire
platform; `app_users.locationid` is where staff actually ended up. Either alone
returns nothing for almost every shop.
The endpoint takes no location parameter. The answer carries PINs, so the
outlet comes from the caller's token and a request without one is refused
whatever POS_AUTH_REQUIRED says — a till must not be able to ask who works at
the shop next door.
Rows with no PIN are dropped rather than sent: a name on screen nobody can sign
in as reads as a broken terminal rather than as an unfinished setup. Duplicate
PINs are dropped too, keeping the first — live data has 1234 on eleven accounts
and 1111 on nine, and two people sharing one would make the till attribute a
bill to whichever row it checked first.
The PIN travels in the clear over TLS, deliberately. Four digits are
brute-forceable in microseconds however they are wrapped, so hashing here would
buy the appearance of strength and not the substance — while costing something
real, since the terminal salts every PIN with its own salt before storing it
and could never verify a hash computed here. A PIN is shift attribution, not a
security boundary; the boundary is the session token.
Verified against live data, and it says the fallback still matters: outlet 1135
— the one the POS actually uses — has zero staff, and the only staff row found
anywhere is a delivery rider on PIN 1111.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The POS surface was open. A till named its own outlet — `store_id` in a query
or in an ingest batch — and was believed, so one number changed in Settings
read another tenant's catalogue or posted bills into their books. There was no
middleware in the codebase at all, and the `JWT_SECRET_KEY` in the config was
read and never used.
Products were never mis-scoped: `resolvePosStore` already derived the tenant
from the location and the catalogue query already filtered on both. The tenant
was never taken from the wire. What was missing was any check that the caller
was entitled to the location they named.
So the outlet now comes *out* of a sign-in rather than going *in* from the
till. `POST /pos/login` authenticates against the same `app_users` rows the web
console uses — one account store, so deactivating a leaver closes both doors —
and answers with the outlets that account may reach, sealed in an HMAC-SHA256
token the terminal cannot edit.
Two checks then guard everything else, in order: the token verifies, and the
outlet named in the request belongs to the token's tenant. The second is the
one that matters — a valid token is a licence to name *your* outlets, not any.
Notes on the awkward parts:
- The guard reads the outlet from the body as well as the query. The two routes
that write carry `store_id` in a JSON batch and never in the URL, so a
query-only check would have left exactly the dangerous call unguarded.
- Three spellings of one thing survive — `store_id`, `locationid`,
`location_id`. All three are read rather than normalised, because renaming
them breaks terminals already in the field.
- `POS_AUTH_REQUIRED` defaults to false. Tills are billing real customers
against the open endpoints right now and enforcing at deploy would stop every
one mid-trade. A token is still verified when sent, and a wrong-tenant token
still refused; the flag only governs requests carrying none.
- `POS_TOKEN_SECRET` has no baked-in fallback and fails loudly. A development
secret in source is the same as no signature at all.
- `configid` is inferred when the till does not send it, because a person at a
counter has no way to know theirs. `authname` is not unique in this schema —
live data has one address twice under one configid — so an ambiguous match is
refused rather than resolved by LIMIT 1, which could bill into the wrong
tenant's books.
Verified against live data: 58 accounts across 34 tenants can open a till, an
account pinned to a location resolves to it alone, a tenant-level account gets
all six of its outlets, and a cross-tenant outlet request is refused.
Passwords are still plaintext platform-wide. Flagged at the comparison site;
fixing it is a migration touching every login path, not this endpoint.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
parsePosSaleDate needed no change — RFC3339Nano already accepts the offset the
terminal now sends, and Format("2006-01-02") on a zoned time still yields the
till's own trading day rather than UTC's. But the ordering of those layouts is
load-bearing and nothing said so, and the two bare layouts are a legacy that
should be recognisable as one: they exist for terminals built before the offset,
whose bills record an instant wrong by the offset with nothing in the payload to
recover it from. Two tests pin both halves, including the case that motivated
this — 00:30 IST, where UTC has not yet rolled into the same day.
The GST script writes only the four packaged lines at 1185, which sat at 0 and
were being billed with no tax at all.
It deliberately does not touch the produce at 1135. That was written believing
every rate was 0 — read from a field name that does not exist in the response,
so the check silently returned nothing. The rows in fact hold 8, 12 and 18, and
under Indian GST fresh unbranded fruit and chilled fish are nil-rated, so
several look like overcharging. Every correction there is a reduction of a live
rate, which belongs to whoever signs the returns rather than to a script. They
are reported as REVIEW and left as found.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two faults found while checking whether today's live bills had landed. They
had — 17 of them, complete — but both of these were sitting in the same data.
**Health existed only over MQTT.** The consumer subscribes to the health topic
and has done since startup, but a terminal on the HTTP route has no way to
reach it. Today's terminal was on HTTP, so it reported nothing and the board
showed "online 0 of 1" while the till was demonstrably alive and selling.
POST /pos/health now takes the same payload the broker carries, into the same
Redis record, so the board cannot tell the two routes apart and does not need
to. It answers 202 and swallows failures: a till that cannot say how it is must
still sell.
**terminalid was empty on 16 of 17 bills.** The consumer backfills a missing
terminal code from the topic, but onto the batch, while the row was built from
the order — the two never met, and importPosOrder was not handed the batch's
value at all. Over HTTP there was no topic to fall back on either. So the
invoice numbers read INV-2608-T5EDD-000NN while the column they should have
matched was blank, and `byterminal` on the sales summary grouped almost
everything under "". The bill's own terminal now wins with the batch's as the
fallback, trimmed, so whitespace is not mistaken for a code.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Every pull was a full snapshot, so a shop with a thousand products
re-sent all of them to correct one price. The response now carries a
revision the terminal stores and hands back, and a pull that supplies
one gets only what moved: the product row, its row at that outlet, or
its stock ledger. Stock is included because a shop's count drifts from a
till's on every sale rung at another counter, and a delta that ignored
it would let that drift persist until someone forced a full pull.
The dangerous part is the flag, not the filter. A response marked
is_delta:false tells the terminal to withdraw every product it does not
mention — so a filtered result carrying that label empties the shelf.
Both are now derived from one value, and there is no path through the
function that filters without also setting the flag.
Everything ambiguous resolves toward the snapshot. A revision that is
malformed, empty, or issued to another outlet yields a zero cutoff and a
complete response; the opposite would leave a terminal permanently
missing changes with nothing to show for it. The revision advances only
on the final page, so a terminal that abandons a paginated pull cannot
end up holding one that claims it saw pages it never received. And the
stamp is taken a second in the past, because a product written during
the same second the query ran would otherwise fall on the wrong side of
the next cutoff and be skipped for good.
A delta still cannot withdraw a deleted product — removing a row from
productlocations leaves no tombstone — so a periodic pull without a
revision is what collects those.
Verified against the live outlet: a full pull of 12, a delta returning
only the one product whose price had changed, and pagination that stays
exact now that productid <= 0 is excluded in SQL rather than after the
LIMIT.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The ingest only ever wrote. A bill that reached pos_orders was safe and
completely unreachable — no screen in the product could show it, and the
only way to see a day's counter takings was to query the database by
hand.
Three endpoints: a paged bill list, one bill with its lines, and a
summary split the three ways somebody actually asks for — by tender for
reconciling a drawer, by day for a chart, by till for an outlet running
several counters.
locationid is required on all of them and is the authorisation boundary,
so a caller cannot page through another shop's takings by omitting a
parameter. Fetching a bill under the wrong outlet returns 404 even when
the reference is a real one.
Dates match businessdate rather than arrival, because a till that was
offline overnight uploads yesterday's bills this morning and they belong
to yesterday. The list is ordered by billedat for the same reason —
sorting by arrival would interleave a recovered backlog through today.
Unlike the ingest handlers these answer in the usual envelope: they are
read by the web app, not by a terminal, and nothing about them is bound
to the till's contract.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
A till holds every bill in its own SQLite database and keeps it for
seven days after we acknowledge it, marking one synced only when its id
comes back in an ack. Everything here follows from that.
Silence is not acceptance, so a failing ingest publishes nothing at all
and the terminal simply sends again. A duplicate is a success, because
at-least-once delivery means a lost ack legitimately re-delivers bills
we already hold, and calling those failures would strand a day of
takings on the till. Deduplication is a unique index on the terminal's
UUID plus an advisory lock held for the transaction.
Bills land in pos_orders / pos_order_items rather than orders: a counter
bill carries a cashier, a terminal, a rounding adjustment, promos,
loyalty movement and a payment split that orders has nowhere to put, and
forcing one into the other loses whatever does not fit. Stock is *not*
split — a counter sale writes the same productstocks rows an app order
does, through helpers extracted from createOrderTx so the rule that
prevents overselling has one implementation rather than two.
GetRevenueSummary and GetSalesSummary were extended to union the new
table in; any new report has to remember the same.
Terminal health goes to Redis under a 90-second TTL, sharing the
instance the express backend uses. A heartbeat is a fact with an expiry
date: a till that loses power stops refreshing and ages off the board by
itself, where a Postgres row would need ~288k writes a day and a reaper.
Proven end to end against the live estate before commit: a bill over
HTTP and one over the real Mosquitto broker, the same bill three times
producing one row and one stock movement, and a heartbeat arriving on
the health endpoint. All probe data was removed afterwards.
Four things that only surfaced against real data. An unset jsonb column
failed the very first bill. Product SKUs are unusable as barcodes — 6,245
products share 93 SKUs and "1" covers 5,794 of them — against the till's
unique index, so barcodes fall back to the product id. A taxpercent of
-1 exists and would have put negative GST in a filed slab. And a product
with id 0 exists, which can never be billed and is now skipped.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
