update ui update and fix layout issue
This commit is contained in:
129
src/features/lyts/mock/lyts.mock.ts
Normal file
129
src/features/lyts/mock/lyts.mock.ts
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
|
||||
import type {ActivityEvent, TimePoint} from '@/features/dashboard/types/dashboard';
|
||||
import type {Reward, RewardStatus} from '@/features/lyts/types/reward';
|
||||
import type {RangeKey} from '@/shared/types/api';
|
||||
import {createRng} from '@/shared/mock/rng';
|
||||
import {buildTimeseries} from '@/features/dashboard/mock/dashboard.mock';
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* The reward catalogue.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* `usageRate` is fixed per reward rather than random, because the story this
|
||||
* module has to tell is that redemption rates differ WILDLY by offer type —
|
||||
* Buy-1-Get-1 is claimed constantly and redeemed rarely, a free coffee is
|
||||
* claimed and used almost immediately. A catalogue where everything converts
|
||||
* at ~50% would make "most claimed" and "least used" the same reward and the
|
||||
* whole module pointless.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1 LYT = ₹1, so costLyt doubles as the rupee liability per redemption.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
const CATALOGUE: {
|
||||
id: string;
|
||||
name: string;
|
||||
costLyt: number;
|
||||
usageRate: number;
|
||||
status: RewardStatus;
|
||||
/** Days from now; null never expires. */
|
||||
expiresInDays: number | null;
|
||||
}[] = [
|
||||
{id: 'r-coffee', name: 'Free Coffee', costLyt: 120, usageRate: 0.72, status: 'active', expiresInDays: 34},
|
||||
{id: 'r-combo20', name: 'Combo 20% off', costLyt: 200, usageRate: 0.34, status: 'expiring', expiresInDays: 2},
|
||||
{id: 'r-weekend', name: 'Weekend Bonus', costLyt: 150, usageRate: 0.81, status: 'expiring', expiresInDays: 4},
|
||||
{id: 'r-birthday', name: 'Birthday Treat', costLyt: 250, usageRate: 0.55, status: 'active', expiresInDays: null},
|
||||
{id: 'r-bogo', name: 'Buy 1 Get 1', costLyt: 400, usageRate: 0.19, status: 'active', expiresInDays: 61},
|
||||
{id: 'r-dessert', name: 'Dessert on us', costLyt: 90, usageRate: 0.44, status: 'paused', expiresInDays: 20},
|
||||
{id: 'r-firstvisit', name: 'First Visit 10%', costLyt: 100, usageRate: 0.63, status: 'active', expiresInDays: 90},
|
||||
{id: 'r-loyalty500', name: 'Loyalty 500', costLyt: 500, usageRate: 0.28, status: 'expired', expiresInDays: -6},
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
export function buildRewards(
|
||||
storeId: string,
|
||||
range: RangeKey,
|
||||
endMs: number,
|
||||
): Reward[] {
|
||||
const scoped = storeId === 'all' ? 1 : 0.28;
|
||||
|
||||
return CATALOGUE.map((r) => {
|
||||
const rng = createRng('reward', r.id, storeId, range);
|
||||
const claimed = Math.round(rng.int(140, 900) * scoped);
|
||||
const used = Math.round(claimed * r.usageRate * rng.float(0.92, 1.08));
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
id: r.id,
|
||||
name: r.name,
|
||||
costLyt: r.costLyt,
|
||||
claimed,
|
||||
used: Math.min(used, claimed),
|
||||
expiresAt:
|
||||
r.expiresInDays === null
|
||||
? null
|
||||
: new Date(endMs + r.expiresInDays * 86400000).toISOString(),
|
||||
status: r.status,
|
||||
};
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Redemptions over time.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Derived from the shared timeseries so redemption volume tracks footfall —
|
||||
* an independent generator would produce a redemption curve that contradicts
|
||||
* the store's own traffic, which is immediately obvious to anyone who knows
|
||||
* their business.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
export function buildRedemptions(
|
||||
storeId: string,
|
||||
range: RangeKey,
|
||||
endMs: number,
|
||||
): TimePoint[] {
|
||||
const points = buildTimeseries(range, storeId, endMs);
|
||||
const rng = createRng('redemptions', storeId, range);
|
||||
|
||||
return points.map((p) => {
|
||||
// Roughly a third of purchases involve a redemption.
|
||||
const redeemed = Math.round(p.purchases * rng.float(0.24, 0.38));
|
||||
const issued = Math.round(redeemed * rng.float(1.5, 2.4));
|
||||
return {
|
||||
t: p.t,
|
||||
// Reusing TimePoint's shape: visitors→issued, purchases→redeemed so the
|
||||
// existing chart primitives apply unchanged.
|
||||
visitors: issued,
|
||||
purchases: redeemed,
|
||||
revenue: redeemed * 140,
|
||||
conversion: issued ? Number(((redeemed / issued) * 100).toFixed(1)) : 0,
|
||||
};
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const LYT_ACTIVITY: {
|
||||
kind: ActivityEvent['kind'];
|
||||
title: string;
|
||||
detail: string;
|
||||
}[] = [
|
||||
{kind: 'reward_redeemed', title: 'Free Coffee redeemed', detail: '120 LYTs · Indiranagar Flagship'},
|
||||
{kind: 'reward_redeemed', title: 'Weekend Bonus redeemed', detail: '150 LYTs · Koramangala'},
|
||||
{kind: 'reward_expired', title: 'Loyalty 500 expired', detail: 'Claimed 310 times · used 87'},
|
||||
{kind: 'reward_redeemed', title: 'Dessert on us redeemed', detail: '90 LYTs · Anna Nagar'},
|
||||
{kind: 'purchase', title: 'Combo 20% applied at checkout', detail: '₹640 basket · Jubilee Hills'},
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
export function buildLytActivity(
|
||||
storeId: string,
|
||||
endMs: number,
|
||||
): ActivityEvent[] {
|
||||
const rng = createRng('lyt-activity', storeId);
|
||||
// Accumulated, not redrawn per index — same ordering bug as buildActivity.
|
||||
let minutesAgo = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
return Array.from({length: 24}, (_, i) => {
|
||||
const tpl = LYT_ACTIVITY[i % LYT_ACTIVITY.length];
|
||||
if (i > 0) minutesAgo += rng.int(8, 50);
|
||||
return {
|
||||
id: `l${i}`,
|
||||
at: new Date(endMs - minutesAgo * 60000).toISOString(),
|
||||
kind: tpl.kind,
|
||||
title: tpl.title,
|
||||
detail: tpl.detail,
|
||||
storeId,
|
||||
};
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user