Files
Behavision/agent
Suriyakumarvijayanayagam 3f9fb33b24 Accounts people can create, and photos on a server with no bucket
A tenant had exactly the users somebody had created with a command on the
server. That is not a missing screen: a shop with an owner and four staff
either shared one password or raised a ticket per person, and a phone app
for the shop floor could not exist while there was one account to sign in
as.

Registration is by invitation, never open signup - the same line already
drawn around creating a company. The code carries the address and the role
and the request carries only a password, so a code that gets forwarded
cannot become somebody else's account, and a staff invitation cannot be
redeemed as an owner. Single use lives in the UPDATE and the account is
created in the same transaction.

Deactivating a member revokes their sessions in that transaction too. An
access token lives twelve hours, so without it "remove their access"
removed it sometime tomorrow. The session list and revoke that go with it
are the benefit of opaque tokens the product had been paying for and never
collecting: nothing could say what was signed in, let alone stop one.

Face images now work on a deployment with no object storage, which was
every local install and every self-hosted site - the arrivals feed said
"not storing customer photos" for every customer forever, on the screen
whose whole job is to show a face. Bounded to one row per visitor, so it
grows with the customer base and not with footfall; the bucket stays
primary wherever one exists.

Image.auth says whether a URL needs the session, because a browser img
cannot load one that does, a mobile image view can, and a webview can do
neither - the desktop client resolves those to a data URI in Go.

Found by running it, not by tests:

  * UPDATE ... RETURNING gives the value AFTER the update, so the prune
    read back empty keys, deleted nothing, and the table grew with
    footfall exactly as if it were not there. The fake agreed with either
    version; only the live Postgres test caught it.
  * Trusting only the auth flag broke every shop card, because Sites.jsx
    rebuilt a partial snapshot object and dropped it. A relative URL is
    now sufficient on its own.
  * ago() renders a future time as "just now", so a code valid for a week
    read "expires just now".

Verified live against real Postgres: invite, preview, escalation refused,
register into a session, replay 404, staff forbidden, device revoked and
401 at once, last owner refused, and a 92,405-byte camera JPEG stored,
served to its owner, 401 with no session, 404 to another tenant, and
rendered in a browser.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HViLj9gYNRtSr7YVZmW5sn
2026-09-05 11:45:42 +05:30
..

Behavision agent (Go)

The half of the edge install that touches the network. The Python engine keeps the cameras and the models; this keeps the tray icon, the UI shell, the MQTT connection and the offline queue.

┌─ agent (Go) ───────────────────┐        ┌─ engine (Python) ────────┐
│ tray icon + WebView2 window    │        │ RTSP capture             │
│ supervises the engine process  │───────▶│ YuNet / ArcFace / FAISS  │
│ MQTT publish + offline spool   │◀───────│ SQLite (biometric)       │
│ S3 handoff, tenant config      │  local │ localhost API + events   │
└────────────────────────────────┘  HTTP  └──────────────────────────┘

Why the split

Go cannot run ONNX, OpenCV or FAISS, so the engine stays Python and ships frozen. Go is here for what it is actually better at: a durable queue that survives a store's internet dropping, a supervised child process, and one language shared with the server so the MQTT contract has a single definition.

Why not a Windows service

A service runs in session 0 and cannot draw a tray icon — that is Windows session isolation, not a library limitation. Since the product is "user starts and stops it from the tray", the agent is a normal user-session process that spawns the engine as a child. That also means it never needs elevation at runtime: starting a child process does not, controlling a service does.

internal/engine is written so a service wrapper can be added later without touching the supervision logic.

Layout

main.go              entry point, mode dispatch
internal/engine      start/stop/supervise the Python engine, health polling
internal/spool       durable event queue (survives restart and outage)
internal/mqtt        broker client, publishes from the spool
internal/config      tenant identity, broker settings, credentials
frontend/            React UI served into the WebView

Build

go build ./...            # agent alone
wails build               # agent + frontend, once the UI is added