Signing in on a second Mac showed "engine not reachable at
http://127.0.0.1:8010" and 0 of 0 cameras, on an account whose shops were
running and recognising people the whole time. Nothing was broken: Live() and
Cameras() read only the engine on loopback, so the app answered as though the
person had never signed in - and camera sync goes through the engine, which is
why the count was zero rather than stale.
Having no engine is a normal state. A shop PC watches cameras; an owner's
laptop, a manager's machine and a second till being set up do not, and all
three are signed in to the same estate. Both methods now fall back to head
office when loopback fails and somebody is signed in. Loopback is still tried
first: a real shop PC must never be shown a minute-old summary when the engine
two milliseconds away has the live one.
Decisions worth keeping:
- Viewing is on the snapshot, not inferred per screen. Three surfaces read it,
and a screen that computed it separately is how the shops screen once came
out labelled Working, in green, above "2 of 3 cameras not connecting".
- fraction_below_gate takes the WORST shop, never an average. 0.10 against
0.73 averages to 0.42 and hides the only shop anyone needs to visit.
- A remote camera is flagged, and Edit, Remove and Check placement are
withheld. They talk to a camera on a LAN this computer cannot reach, and a
button that cannot work is worse than one that is absent.
- connected is three states. null is "no shop computer has reported yet" and
reads as waiting; false is "Not connecting". A bare false sends somebody to
check cabling on a camera nobody has tried to reach.
- Snapshots are fetched in Go as data: URIs and cached by snapshot_at. A
webview <img> resolves a relative src against wails:// and cannot send the
bearer - the problem VisitorImage already solved - and this screen polls
every 8 seconds at ~90 KB a camera.
- With no engine AND no session, the engine error is still the answer. The
person is most likely setting this PC up.
The picture is the last snapshot and the banner says so: there is no live
video from here, because the engine's MJPEG stream is on the shop PC's
loopback behind a router with no inbound route. The LiveHub relay head office
uses is the answer to that and is a further step for this client.
Verified against production: five arrivals and two cameras parsed from the
real API. viewing_test.go covers the fallback, the worst-shop rule, the
withheld credentials and that an unchanged snapshot is fetched once across
two polls.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KGcjxF1cNLcuwc3DAPcnfj
The agent read the engine's generated credential file once, at startup.
On a brand new install that file does not exist yet: the agent starts the
engine, and the engine writes its credential seconds later. So the agent
held an empty credential for the life of the process and every call it
makes - health, stats, camera sync, the embedding for a visit - came back
401, with a tray showing a red engine that was running perfectly.
Measured on a fresh state directory today: three 401s, no camera ever
reconciled, and the engine left running the YAML-seeded main stream
instead of the sub-stream head office holds. The install script hid this
on Windows because setup runs the engine once before the app starts.
config.Creds resolves lazily and re-reads on a rejection; the camera
client, the supervisor and the desktop app's engine client all retry once
when it changes. A configured BEHAVISION_API_USER is never re-read - an
operator who set one means it. Tests pin the actual first-run ordering.
Also adds demo/, a one-screen live console for showing the whole chain:
camera, the six steps with a measured camera-to-cloud latency, the
customer editable in place, and the raw JSON a phone and a dashboard
receive from production side by side.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KGcjxF1cNLcuwc3DAPcnfj
The add-camera form asked for an IP address, and a shop owner does not
know their camera's IP address - it is on a sticker under the camera or
in a menu that differs by make. That field is where onboarding stopped
for anyone who was not an installer.
behavision/discover.py: one ONVIF WS-Discovery multicast (names the
camera and often its make) merged with a TCP sweep of port 554 across
the local /24 (misses nothing that streams). Stdlib only, ~4 s on the
office network, both cameras found. The add-camera sheet leads with
'Find cameras on this network'; picking a row fills the address and,
when the make is recognisable, the stream path.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KGcjxF1cNLcuwc3DAPcnfj
Seen on the first claimed demo install: 'session expired' on every
screen, signed in as a user from the previous demo's head office, and
'Watching 3 cameras' for a shop with one - the PC had offered its two
leftover cameras up to head office, without their passwords, so the
same lens was listed twice and one copy could never be pushed anywhere.
Claiming now clears any stored session (a new head office is a new
world), a session whose refresh fails is forgotten on disk as well as
in memory so the app returns to Login by itself, and the demo setup
removes cameras left from an earlier install before it joins the shop,
because head office is the source of truth from then on.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KGcjxF1cNLcuwc3DAPcnfj
Ask Behavision: a panel beside any screen that talks to the head-office
assistant as the signed-in user - setup questions and 'is my shop
working' answered by the same thing, without leaving the app. The
assistant's prompt now knows how the product is set up (installation
codes, adding a camera, what a placement verdict means, the model
download on first run), so it is the help and not only the analyst. A
PC running on its own has nobody to ask and gets the essentials as text.
Cameras and Customers were still on the pre-redesign markup - the add
camera drawer ran off the right edge of the window because it used a
class the new stylesheet never sized. Both are rebuilt: cameras as
picture-led cards with connection and 'proven' as two separate claims
and a placement check laid out as the two steps it is; the customer
record as a proper sheet.
mock.js renders the app in a browser with fake bindings
(?mock=fresh|standalone|claimed, dev server only), so a screen can be
put in front of somebody without a Windows build. It is how these were
reviewed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KGcjxF1cNLcuwc3DAPcnfj
The first Windows install reached the setup screen, typed an
installation code, and was told the session had expired. There was no
session. The code had been minted on a different head office, and the
server said so - 401 bad_token, "That installation code is not valid.
Ask for a new one." - and the client threw the message away, because it
mapped every 401 to the string "session expired".
A 401 on a call that carried a session is a session problem. A 401 on a
call that carried none is about the request, and the server's message is
the answer. The client now tells them apart by whether it sent a token.
Two tests, one for each side of the rule.
Also: a launcher for pointing a Windows PC at a head office on the LAN,
with the two settings that needs and a comment saying why neither is
acceptable outside a demo.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KGcjxF1cNLcuwc3DAPcnfj
Every id in the schema is a uuid and stays one. What was wrong was
putting one in front of a person: RecordVisit named every new customer
'Visitor ' || left(id::text, 8), so the arrivals feed, the shop PC and
the mobile app all read "Visitor 3446ec35" - the string a shop assistant
reads to a colleague and types into a search box. label is a stored
column staff can overwrite and SearchVisitors matches on, so formatting
around it in a front end would have left the data wrong on three
surfaces.
Migration 012 adds a per-client visitors.number, taken from a counter on
clients with UPDATE ... RETURNING inside the visit transaction. Per
client rather than global: a global sequence would tell any customer who
signs up how many people the whole platform has ever seen, from their
own first visitor number. The backfill numbers existing rows by
first_seen_at and relabels only the eight-hex pattern the old statement
produced, so a human-typed name is never overwritten.
Three of the four things anyone addresses by URL already had a human
name and the API simply refused it - a site has a slug, a camera has the
id the engine knows it by. refs.go accepts either form anywhere an id is
taken; a uuid resolves with no lookup, so every URL a client already
stored keeps working.
- An ambiguous camera name resolves to nothing, never to a guess: two
shops may each have an "Office1" and acting on the first row would
edit the wrong shop's camera.
- 404 on a path, 400 on a query filter. /api/visits answered fine and it
was the filter that was wrong.
- site and site_id are both accepted everywhere now. They differed per
endpoint, and an unknown query parameter is silently ignored, so
getting it the wrong way round returned the whole estate.
- The search matches V-13, which is what the product now shows.
Two bugs found by running it rather than testing it:
- 'Visitor ' || $2::text beside number = $2 makes Postgres deduce two
types for one parameter and refuse the insert. It compiled and passed
every in-memory test; the first real database rejected it, along with
the existing face tests that share the path.
- The fallback avatar said "V1" for Visitor 13, Visitor 10 and Visitor
15 alike, and read as the V-1 reference for a fourth person. It shows
the number now. The prop is customerRef, not ref - React reserves
that name and it would never have arrived.
Verified on the live database and through the running API: 13 hex labels
became Visitor 1-13 in first-seen order, two typed names left alone, and
the same customer reachable by uuid, V-13 and 13.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HViLj9gYNRtSr7YVZmW5sn
A tenant had exactly the users somebody had created with a command on the
server. That is not a missing screen: a shop with an owner and four staff
either shared one password or raised a ticket per person, and a phone app
for the shop floor could not exist while there was one account to sign in
as.
Registration is by invitation, never open signup - the same line already
drawn around creating a company. The code carries the address and the role
and the request carries only a password, so a code that gets forwarded
cannot become somebody else's account, and a staff invitation cannot be
redeemed as an owner. Single use lives in the UPDATE and the account is
created in the same transaction.
Deactivating a member revokes their sessions in that transaction too. An
access token lives twelve hours, so without it "remove their access"
removed it sometime tomorrow. The session list and revoke that go with it
are the benefit of opaque tokens the product had been paying for and never
collecting: nothing could say what was signed in, let alone stop one.
Face images now work on a deployment with no object storage, which was
every local install and every self-hosted site - the arrivals feed said
"not storing customer photos" for every customer forever, on the screen
whose whole job is to show a face. Bounded to one row per visitor, so it
grows with the customer base and not with footfall; the bucket stays
primary wherever one exists.
Image.auth says whether a URL needs the session, because a browser img
cannot load one that does, a mobile image view can, and a webview can do
neither - the desktop client resolves those to a data URI in Go.
Found by running it, not by tests:
* UPDATE ... RETURNING gives the value AFTER the update, so the prune
read back empty keys, deleted nothing, and the table grew with
footfall exactly as if it were not there. The fake agreed with either
version; only the live Postgres test caught it.
* Trusting only the auth flag broke every shop card, because Sites.jsx
rebuilt a partial snapshot object and dropped it. A relative URL is
now sufficient on its own.
* ago() renders a future time as "just now", so a code valid for a week
read "expires just now".
Verified live against real Postgres: invite, preview, escalation refused,
register into a session, replay 404, staff forbidden, device revoked and
401 at once, last owner refused, and a 92,405-byte camera JPEG stored,
served to its owner, 401 with no session, 404 to another tenant, and
rendered in a browser.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HViLj9gYNRtSr7YVZmW5sn
Five components that ship as one product:
- behavision/ the recognition engine. RTSP ingest, YuNet detection, IoU
tracking, ArcFace embeddings, a FAISS/SQLite gallery, and a
FastAPI dashboard. Identity is decided once per TRACK from an
average of at least three embeddings, never per frame.
- agent/ the Go edge agent: supervises the engine, holds a durable
spool, and drains it to MQTT. Nothing is acked before the
broker confirms.
- desktop/ the shop PC application (Wails + React + tray).
- server/ the cloud API, MQTT consumer, reports and assistant.
- web/ platform.loyaly.ai, the head-office app, embedded in the
server binary.
The gallery stores 512-float embeddings and timestamps - no images unless
`app.store_faces` is switched on. Those embeddings are biometric personal
data under GDPR and India's DPDP: template inversion reconstructs a
recognisable face from an ArcFace vector, so data/behavision.db is treated
as a biometric database and DELETE /api/visitors/{id} is a real erasure.
CLAUDE.md carries the reasoning behind every non-obvious decision here,
including the ones that were measured and the ones that were wrong first.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HViLj9gYNRtSr7YVZmW5sn
