Reported from the first Windows install: the camera feed lags. It did,
and not because of the network, the proxy or the webview.
The MJPEG stream served _annotated_jpeg - the frame the pipeline had
most recently FINISHED with, encoded after detection, quality scoring,
tracking and identification had all run on it. On a modest shop PC that
is a few frames a second, and every picture was already as old as that
processing. It looked like lag because it was lag. On the fast machine
it was developed on the pipeline kept up with the stream's own 10 fps
cap, which is why nobody here ever saw it.
Two more things compounded it. Every processed frame was JPEG-encoded
whether or not a viewer existed - CPU spent on precisely the machine
short of it. And ffmpeg ran its RTSP demuxer with default buffering,
which holds a comfortable queue of frames before handing over the first:
half a second to two seconds a live view can never recover.
Now the picture and the boxes are decoupled. latest_jpeg_since takes the
capture thread's freshest frame at the camera's own rate and draws the
boxes from the last processed frame over it - encoded on demand, per
request, so a camera nobody watches costs no encode at all. The stream
sends a frame only when the camera has a newer one, capped at 15 fps;
nothing is sent twice. Boxes older than a second are not drawn, so a
stalled pipeline cannot leave one floating over an empty spot.
_publish_annotated becomes _remember_tracks: a handful of tuples under
the lock, no copy, no encode. ffmpeg gets nobuffer / low_delay /
max_delay.
Measured on cam2's sub-stream, same machine, ten seconds each:
before 99 frames sent, 98 distinct 9.8 new pictures/s
after 141 frames sent, 141 distinct 14.0 new pictures/s
against a 15 fps camera, with the pipeline still processing 166 of 181
captured frames alongside - and engine CPU DOWN from 90% with no viewer
to 62% with one attached.
Engine version 1.0.0 -> 1.1.0 so a re-run of setup reinstalls it rather
than pip deciding the requirement is already satisfied.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KGcjxF1cNLcuwc3DAPcnfj
I got this wrong first time. "Head office cannot show live video cheaply"
conflated TRUE VIDEO with SEEING THE CAMERA NOW, and only the first needs
WebRTC and a TURN server.
The shop PC is behind a router with no inbound route, so head office
cannot pull the engine's MJPEG. It can answer the agent's outbound
requests, which is the shape of everything else here: the server holds a
poll open, the agent asks "is anyone watching?", and pushes JPEGs up for
exactly as long as somebody is.
Measured on the office camera: 98 KB full frame, 20.8 KB re-encoded at
640/q60, so one watcher costs ~83 KB/s. 47 frames arrived in 12 seconds -
4 fps, as configured. The UI says "about 4 frames a second" rather than
letting anyone conclude the camera stutters.
Nothing is uploaded when nobody is looking, which is the whole cost
argument: Publish returns false once the last viewer goes, interest lapses
on a timer each viewer refreshes as it reads (so a closed tab stops the
upload within seconds), one push is capped at five minutes, and the UI
streams one camera at a time.
LiveHub is deliberately the opposite of the arrivals Hub. There a doorbell
pushes nothing because nothing may be lost; here a dropped frame is the
correct outcome, so each viewer has a one-slot buffer that is overwritten -
the only frame worth having is the newest, and a queue would show an
ever-growing delay behind the shop instead of dropping back to live.
Ownership is proved once, before anything streams: the relay is keyed on a
camera id, a hub does not know whose camera it holds, and a camera id is
not a secret. Verified: another tenant gets 404, no session gets 401, and
an agent cannot push into another site's camera.
Also fixes a bug I introduced with it - the Live button was gated on
`connected`, which is head office's last report and up to two minutes
stale, so it hid itself during every reconnect. "Is that camera really
down?" is exactly when somebody wants to look, and a hidden control says
"you cannot" where the honest answer is "here is why".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HViLj9gYNRtSr7YVZmW5sn
Five components that ship as one product:
- behavision/ the recognition engine. RTSP ingest, YuNet detection, IoU
tracking, ArcFace embeddings, a FAISS/SQLite gallery, and a
FastAPI dashboard. Identity is decided once per TRACK from an
average of at least three embeddings, never per frame.
- agent/ the Go edge agent: supervises the engine, holds a durable
spool, and drains it to MQTT. Nothing is acked before the
broker confirms.
- desktop/ the shop PC application (Wails + React + tray).
- server/ the cloud API, MQTT consumer, reports and assistant.
- web/ platform.loyaly.ai, the head-office app, embedded in the
server binary.
The gallery stores 512-float embeddings and timestamps - no images unless
`app.store_faces` is switched on. Those embeddings are biometric personal
data under GDPR and India's DPDP: template inversion reconstructs a
recognisable face from an ArcFace vector, so data/behavision.db is treated
as a biometric database and DELETE /api/visitors/{id} is a real erasure.
CLAUDE.md carries the reasoning behind every non-obvious decision here,
including the ones that were measured and the ones that were wrong first.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HViLj9gYNRtSr7YVZmW5sn
