Suspend or reinstate a company (PATCH /api/admin/clients/{id}), reset
its owner's password (shown once), and delete it - and an owner can
remove a shop opened by mistake (DELETE /api/sites/{site}, empty only).
Suspension ends every session the company holds in the same
transaction: login and ingest already refused an inactive client, but a
live access token would have kept reading for up to twelve hours, so
'suspend' would have meant 'suspend some time tomorrow'. Deletion is
deliberately two steps - the company must already be suspended and the
request repeats the slug - because the data under it is biometric.
Face images go first (a storage failure aborts with nothing touched),
then the broker logins, then the rows by cascade.
Exercised against the local Postgres and broker: create, open a shop,
remove it (two plugin commands), refuse delete while active, suspend
(owner's token 401 immediately), reset, delete, zero rows left.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KGcjxF1cNLcuwc3DAPcnfj
The flow this product is sold on is three tiers: the platform admin
registers a merchant, the merchant registers their sales staff, the
staff sign in on a phone. Tier 1 handed the new owner a password. Tier 2
could not - a manager could only mint an invitation code, which the
salesperson had to redeem themselves, on their own phone, choosing their
own password. Good practice, and no use to a manager setting somebody up
before their first shift with a card and a pen.
POST /api/team/members mirrors POST /api/admin/clients: generated
password unless one is given, returned exactly once, bcrypt-hashed on
the way in and not recoverable after. Same permission shape as an
invitation - manager and above, only an owner mints an owner, admin
refused - so a manager cannot do through one door what they are refused
at the other. The invitation path stays; it is the better one whenever
the salesperson has their phone.
POST /api/team/{id}/password is the everyday case on a shop floor:
they forgot it. It sets a new one AND revokes every session they hold,
in one transaction, because the other reason a manager resets a
password is a lost phone, and a reset that left that phone signed in
would look complete while fixing nothing. Tenant-scoped in the UPDATE
itself; another company's user id is 404, never 403. No self-service
and no reset-by-email, deliberately: a floor account often has no
mailbox anyone checks, and the person who can vouch for the salesperson
standing in front of them is their manager.
RandomPassword moves from a private helper in the store to auth, so the
admin path, the merchant path and the reset all mint the same 80-bit
credential - rather than someone later writing a shorter one for the
"less important" account.
Verified: eight handler tests, and two against a real Postgres for the
things a fake cannot see - the RETURNING list scans on a row with no
last_login_at, the tenant scope holds, and the sessions row is actually
revoked. The tenant cleanup from yesterday held throughout.
API.md now documents the chain with both paths, and the note saying a
merchant could not create a login directly is gone because it is no
longer true.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KGcjxF1cNLcuwc3DAPcnfj
Five components that ship as one product:
- behavision/ the recognition engine. RTSP ingest, YuNet detection, IoU
tracking, ArcFace embeddings, a FAISS/SQLite gallery, and a
FastAPI dashboard. Identity is decided once per TRACK from an
average of at least three embeddings, never per frame.
- agent/ the Go edge agent: supervises the engine, holds a durable
spool, and drains it to MQTT. Nothing is acked before the
broker confirms.
- desktop/ the shop PC application (Wails + React + tray).
- server/ the cloud API, MQTT consumer, reports and assistant.
- web/ platform.loyaly.ai, the head-office app, embedded in the
server binary.
The gallery stores 512-float embeddings and timestamps - no images unless
`app.store_faces` is switched on. Those embeddings are biometric personal
data under GDPR and India's DPDP: template inversion reconstructs a
recognisable face from an ArcFace vector, so data/behavision.db is treated
as a biometric database and DELETE /api/visitors/{id} is a real erasure.
CLAUDE.md carries the reasoning behind every non-obvious decision here,
including the ones that were measured and the ones that were wrong first.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HViLj9gYNRtSr7YVZmW5sn
