Files
krow_backend/skills/staffing-risk.md
2026-08-28 12:21:44 +05:30

3.0 KiB

id, name, description, category, pages, status, version, triggers, owliver
id name description category pages status version triggers owliver
staffing-risk Staffing Risk Identify open roles that will not fill on their own, and say why. workforce
positions
control-center
active 1
staffing risk
staffing gap
roles*at risk
positions*at risk
understaffed
enabled suggestions capabilities responses
true
label capability
Which roles are at risk? list
label capability
Summarize staffing risk summary
summary
list
table
insight
summary list table insight
title source
Staffing risk positions.risk
title source limit
Roles at risk positions.risk 5
title source
Roles at risk positions.risk
title source
Biggest staffing risk positions.risk

Staffing Risk

Purpose

  • Name the open roles that are not going to fill without intervention.
  • Say which of four distinct problems each one has, because each has a different fix.
  • Rank them so the reader knows which to deal with first.

Capabilities

  • Count the open roles currently at risk.
  • List those roles, worst first, with the reason for each.
  • Identify the single role most in need of attention.

Data

Reads positions.risk, which joins open JobPosting records to their JobApplication records through the same buildPosition reading the Positions page renders from. No separate calculation, so a risk reported here and a health badge shown there cannot disagree.

Analysis

A role is at risk when any of the following is true. They are kept apart rather than combined into a score, because the score would hide the only part that tells the reader what to do:

  1. No applicants yet — nobody has applied. Needs sourcing.
  2. No candidate scoring 70 or above — people applied, none are viable. Needs the requirements or the pay revisiting.
  3. Three or more unscreened — a backlog nobody has looked at. Needs screening.
  4. Someone awaiting a decision — a strong candidate has been screened and not moved on. Needs a person to decide.

Ranking weights an empty pipeline above a busy one that needs attention, since an empty pipeline takes longest to recover.

Output

A count of roles at risk, then a row per role naming its department and its reasons. A role with no problems is not listed.

Limitations

  • Only open roles are considered. A paused or closed role is not at risk.
  • "Viable" means an AI score of 70 or above. An unscored candidate is not counted as viable, so a role whose applicants nobody has screened will report both an unscreened backlog and no viable candidate — those are two true statements about the same cause.
  • This reads the pipeline, not the roster. It does not know how many people a role needs, because no position in this workspace states a headcount.